.
Feedback

Is Teamsters Local 117 Asking Too Much of Waste Management?

In light of the strike, and comments we've seen about the compensation package, here are some ideas to chew on and discuss with your neighbors on Patch

 

Wages and compensation can be a complex issue to sort out, for sure. Wednesday, July 25, recycling and yard waste drivers with Kirkland-based Waste Management, which serves parts of Sammamish, went on strike, after months of collective bargaining talks went sour in June.

A major issue raised by the workers, represented by Teamsters Local 117, has been wages, and in particular a $9 per hour disparity between what recyling/yard waste drivers and refuse collection drivers make.

Last month, Waste Management extended its , which at the end of the six-year contract includes $98,000 total annual compensation for those recycling workers.

To clarify what that means, since on the face of it that sort of sounds like wages only in some of the articles we've published on Patch, and both Patch users and my friends have expressed exasperation at that figure, I asked Waste Management spokeswoman Robin Freedman to help me make sure everything is clear on the compensation front.

Here is her response:

"The offer of $98,000 is the total compensation our drivers will receive at the end of the proposed six-year contract. That includes a 4 percent raise year over year and it includes a healthy employer funded pension and health benefits.

"On average, drivers make $58,000 and at the end of the proposed 6-year contract, they will make $68,000 salary."

So for perspective, add to the salary benefits such as health care, sick and vacation pay, and a generous employer pension contribution of some $10,000 annually. You could compare the pension contribution to your employer's 401k match, for example.

Is this compensation outrageous for this area? As a benchmark for comparison, you could look at U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, which put average wages (wages only) for refuse workers at $44,960 statewide, but that includes the whole state, much of which has a lower cost of living than Waste Management's coverage area. Still, Washington is the third-highest paying state for refuse collection (recycling and yard waste within the same industry is not broken out on the report).

According to reports, such as on Northwest Cable News, Teamsters 117 has said the biggest bone of contention is a difference of up to $9 per hour in pay for recycling workers versus refuse workers. Along with today's strike, the union has claimed labor violations by .

Freedman said the company cannot comment on other contracts, but that it feels it put forward a good offer.

"We are proud of the offer we have put forth. It is fair and generous—especially in these economic times," Freedman said.

Do you think it's enough? Please share your thoughts.

Karen Ozanich July 26, 2012 at 04:07 pm
I have several friends who have worked in this industry over the years. It is very taxing and difficult work, with a high risk for injury. These workers have needed to fight for every penny they have increased over the years, through negotiations and (sometimes) strikes. The disparity between the different factions (yard waste v trash) is real, and needs to be considered in the negotiations. I totally support the workers in this one. The company needs to be real and meet the needs of their employees.
Be kind, supportive and understanding with your neighborhood Teamsters. Put your trash back out next week, and give them an extra smile and thank you when you see them. They are hard working neighbors of ours, just trying to make a living like all of us.
Greg Johnston (Editor) July 26, 2012 at 04:11 pm
Thank you for your thoughts Karen. Aside from the current dispute, I have an acquaintance who drove refuse trucks in this area for years and he is now disabled due to on-the-job injuries.
Angie July 26, 2012 at 07:23 pm
$58k? I bet there are a lot of people on unemployment that would be thrilled with that salary. Add benefits and pension. Unbelievable that they are striking.
Chris July 28, 2012 at 01:06 pm
Hang on. My garbage trucks out here are the type that the driver doesn't even have to get out of the truck, simply operate a swing arm. This is in Kirkland. It's not the Kim of tricks where you have to hop out and dump it. While most people are stuck in salary freezes or not even working (especially those in the blue collar trades) they're complaining about a guaranteed (non-performance related) 4% year over year raise?!?!
Greg Johnston (Editor) July 28, 2012 at 01:29 pm
Chris, yes, the trucks have swing arms and in most cases the driver doesn't get out. But in the case of yard waste, any extra bags left by a customer must be physically picked up and loaded onto the arm. I've seen drivers have to load 8-10 heavy bags at a time (my neighbor has a big lot and generates lots of yard waste). Just wanted to clarify that one point.
R. M. L. July 29, 2012 at 12:22 am
Does anyone know that the recycle, yard waste drivers are averaging 12 to 14 ours a day? When you put the dangers, not just for the driver, but all around (i.e. kids, schools, back ins, property, etc.) the risk is that much more than just lets say a truck driver on the open highway. The garbage trucks although about 36 feet long and 10 1/2 feet wide, 13' 6" high weigh as much as a fully loaded tractor trailer with a 53' trailer. These are not normal trucks. They skid on dry pavement like ice, have to stop at every house, and we all know we don't space our carts out 2 feet from each other and away from cars, lights, walls, bushes, fences, mailboxes and anything those automated arms can hit.....so what do they have to do? Get out and move them. Automated or not, at about 1100+ customers a day for 117 and 500 to 600 for garbage you will get hurt, tired, and very sick doing that job. I speak from experience. In most lines of business......the higher the risk...the higher the pay....the more need for safety and SUPPORT is the reality.
Kirkland Tony July 29, 2012 at 05:35 pm
RML, yes, the higher risk, the higher the pay... but not because some bullying union has decreed a monopoly on the labor market and refused to even let it's members decide on the contract proposal. No, it's because qualified (healthy/strong) people won't take the job until the pay meets their personal valuation of the pain, effort and risk.
Which means it would take much more than $150K for me to choose that job, simply because I have other options (more education and skills) and I'm no longer young with biceps of iron. But I know quite a few guys who work construction... when it's available... for whom this would be a dream job at half that. Meanwhile, the union trash haulers are simply not capable of doing my job. Few people are. So I get paid a higher wage without have a union intimidate my employer.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Kirkland Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin June 14, 2013 at 06:34 am
In the City of Kirkland you need a City-issued business license to do Door-to-door solicitation. IRead More am willing to bet they did not have the license. Call the police next time.
Buddies at an exercise run!
Heather Stark June 17, 2013 at 01:36 am
This lady has a real way with dogs! Kind, soft spoken, yet authoritative with the dogs, you canRead More tell your pet will be in good hands. She's helped me with my Newfoundland and a friend's Clumber Spaniel. I highly recommend her.
Aging well seminar June 4th, 12th
Jeanne Gustafson (Editor) May 30, 2013 at 05:58 am
Hi Paul, I don't see the attached flyer. Could you try again to upload it to your announcement? I'mRead More sure a lot of people would love to have more details about the seminar.