Letter to the Editor: City is Right to Forge Ahead with Cross Kirkland Trail Plan

Dear Editor:

I'd like to offer but one, of many, reasons why the City of Kirkland should correctly forge ahead with development of a Trail in the Cross Kirkland Corridor........it was the "top priority" recommendation of the Urban Land Institute, a nonpartisan organization that is long recognized as one of America's most respected and widely quoted sources of objective information on urban planning, growth, and development of sustainable thriving communities worldwide.  Our City Council sought an objective opinion about Totem Lake and how Kirkland might help spur development there.  

In a report entitled Urban Land Institute Technical Assistance Panel Recommendations to the City of Kirkland on Totem Lake, ULI most strongly recommends the development in the BNSF Corridor of a trail...."there is obvious value in developing the corridor as a bicycle and pedestrian trail, even as it retains its potential for future regional rail transit....",  "leverag(ing) open space assets and trail potential...deserves top priority".  (You can read the entire report at the website below.)   www.kirklandwa.gov/assets/cmo/cmo+pdfs/uli+tech+assist+recommendation+report.pdf     

Totem Lake is Kirkland's designated Urban Growth Area (as required and recognized by the State and King County under the Growth Management Act).  The City is actively pursuing codes and regulations that encourage re-development in the area, and promote a more integrated, vital and sustainable neighborhood that will responsibly help fulfill Kirkland's designated share of the anticipated growth in the region. The ULI's recommendation to develop a Trail in the CKC suggests one very important project that will facilitate meeting those GMA goals.  

Kirkland citizens support the City of Kirkland moving forward with an interim Trail, while yet planning for high capacity transit in the future when the Corridor can be designed AND engineered to 21st century transit standards, not relegated to 1900's technology that existing heavy rail represents.

Georgine Foster,

Kirkland Resident

Editor's note: Kirkland Patch reported on the ULI Panel's recommendations in July, 2011. You can read that story here. Patch welcomes your letters; email to kirkland@patch.com, or upload to our Local Voices section.