.
Feedback

What Do John Koster and Todd Akin Have in Common? A Lot

John Koster and Todd Akin are two peas in a pod.

 

JOHN KOSTER, candidate for Washington's First Congressional District – which includes parts of Kirkland, Redmond and Woodinville and extends north to the Canadian border – holds many of the same views as Todd Akin, who is the GOP’s candidate for U.S. Senate in Missouri.

Akin recently took the deplorable public position that certain forms of rape are legitimate and that in no case should a woman, even in cases of rape, be allowed to terminate her pregnancy.  It is clear that Koster shares Akin’s stance on rape and abortion:  In an April 2012 Seattle Times article, Koster was quoted as saying that he “opposes abortions under any circumstances, including incest and rape.” 

But there are other terrifying ways in which Koster is Akin’s replica.  For example, Koster would kill the education department.  During a June 2010 Snohomish County Liberty Action Committee event, Koster said that we need to “abolish the Department of Education.”  Akin too shares those views.

According to an August 17 Kansas City Star article, Akin said that he is against federal spending for the National School Lunch Program, which provides cash and surplus food for nearly 650,000 school lunches in Missouri each day.  And in response to the question “Is it something the federal government should do?” Akin answered: “No. … I think the federal government should be out of the education business.”

Koster denies climate change.  In response to the following question posed at a June 3, 2010 Snohomish County meeting, “Do you believe man is responsible for climate change,” Koster stated his answer clearly: “No.  Absolutely not.”  Akin is no different.

Addressing the House floor, Akin – a member of the House Science and Technology Committee – called the threat of global warming a “comedy.”  Specifically, he said “This whole thing strikes me if it weren’t so serious as being a comedy you know. … Who in the world wants to put politicians in charge of the weather anyways? What a dumb idea….”

Koster and Akin are both Tea Party proponents.  During a June 3, 2010 Snohomish County meeting, Koster said “The Tea Party movement…is one of the most exciting things that’s happening to this country for a long time.”  As part of that Tea Party, Koster shares its goal of privatizing social security.  During a February 16, 2010 speech given at a luncheon on Whidbey Island, Koster claimed that we would be better off if social security, Medicaid and Medicare were handled within “individual retirement accounts.”  Put another way, “privatized.”

In 2001, Akin co-signed a letter to President Obama’s Commission to Strengthen Social Security calling for privatization.  The letter said “Social Security reform must offer younger workers the opportunity to improve their rates of return using personal retirement accounts.” 

And it is no surprise that Koster opposes same sex marriage.  In fact, Koster believes it undermines “the very cornerstone of our society.”  And Akin?  Well, during a 2006 speech made to the House floor, Akin said that “Anybody who knows something about the history of the human race knows that there is no civilization which has condoned homosexual marriage widely and openly that has long survived.”

There are other similarities:  Koster is pro-gun.  He would reject “any legislation” that might curtail a person’s ability to own a gun, while Akin willingly advertises his “A” lifetime rating with the NRA.  Koster, like Akin, supports increased domestic oil drilling.  During a 2010 radio interview, Koster said plainly that we should “Drill here and drill now.”  And despite the recent Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster, Koster still takes the position that our current “regulatory structure is, believe me, more than enough at this current time to protect the environment.”  Akin is no different.

In fairness to Koster, according to an August 20 Seattle Times article, Koster criticized Akin’s recent rape statements as being “reprehensible and bizarre.”  But Koster added that he wanted people to know that “not all pro-life people are crazy.”  That might be the case.  But it is more likely the case that Koster is not among the exceptions, but instead embodies the rule.

_____

Trent Latta is an attorney and lives in Kirkland.  He may be reached at TrentLatta@gmail.com. 


MJ August 25, 2012 at 01:30 pm
We have some common ground Chris, and it is the common ground, that will bring us all together. I considered keeping the child because it was mine, not his. However, he stalked me, called me, showed up at my work place. I couldn't imagine a life tied to him. He actually told me he and his family would sue me for visitation.
If the laws were changed to protect women in these situations, and if the rapists received longer jail times, women may in fact feel differently. As a party we should focus on this and change the laws so more women consider not having abortions. On this we most definitely agree.
MJ August 25, 2012 at 01:31 pm
Jerri,
I think you misunderstood Chris. he said he doesn't believe the rapist should have access and believes the laws should be changed to protect women in these situations.
Chris Nandor August 25, 2012 at 02:12 pm
As MJ said ... you misunderstood me. Again. You keep doing this. Most of what you've said about my posts is backward from what I've actually written. Please read more carefully. I say in your quote of me the OPPOSITE of what you accuse me of. I said the rapist CANNOT have the children and we should CHANGE any laws that allow it.
Jerri Eckart August 25, 2012 at 03:01 pm
You are correct I read it wrong,..my apologies!
FF2 August 26, 2012 at 12:17 pm
Open minded Republican ex-gov. Charlie Crist explains why he is voting for Obama.
http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/columns/former-gov-charlie-crist-heres-why-im-backing-barack-obama/1247631
Ken James August 26, 2012 at 02:21 pm
Don't get too excited... not only he ex-gov, he is also ex-Republican. He has made it clear that he will do anything, including change parties, to regain power. It was 'way back' in 2010 when he stated that he didn’t agree “with the guy on hardly anything,” I guess Obama's success on improving the economy over the last two years has really made an impression on Crist..... or, as most insiders believe, it is that when his party change is official, he'll run for FL governor again as a Democrat.
I especially appreciated his comment: "...the president served as the nation's calm through a historically turbulent storm." Ah yes... he has definitely been calm... I rather wish that other emotions, and policies, were evident to improve the economic conditions for all; not just his cash bundlers posing as "green energy" peddlers or bailing out union auto workers at the expense of the American tax payers and bond holders.
FF2 August 27, 2012 at 12:54 am
Yeah Ken, let's talk about the Cheney Energy Task Force...
Ken James August 27, 2012 at 01:35 am
Sure, we could talk about that. I don't get the connection to the current topic. Perhaps you are seeing rising gas prices and you wish the current administration had embraced the policys? I had to do a little research to refresh my memory, but I listed below the three primary themes/challenges. Even though the report was issued in 2001, most of the observations are still valid today... probably more so.
Proposed National Energy Policy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Task_Force) Using energy wisely is cited as the first challenge for the nation, as this will lessen the burden on our finances and the environment. The second listed challenge was to repair and add onto the existing network of refineries, pipelines, generators and transmission lines. It was stated that the refining and distribution of natural gas was effected by an inefficient and inadequate infrastructure, and that this issue could be remedied by 38,000 miles of new pipeline and 255,000 miles of distribution lines. The third challenge is "increasing energy supplies while protecting the environment
FF2 August 27, 2012 at 10:06 am
...all of which led to the lies that allowed us to enter Iraq and occupy their oil, costing us billions per month and bankrupting our nation...
Solyndra is child's play in comparison. All you do is trot out the Republican talking points...
Chris Nandor August 27, 2012 at 10:34 am
Wow, Forrest. Cheney's Energy Task Force caused the war in Iraq? That's too crazy to even be a Democratic talking point.
Ken James August 27, 2012 at 02:15 pm
Forrest, if your point is that Republicans have also been responsible for politically inspired wasteful spending, I agree entirely. But is it a good idea to justify problems by pointing to the past and finding prior examples? During the 2008 campaign, Senator Obama railed against the influence of money in Washington so it makes his engagement in that business even more egregious than it might be.
So you feel that mention of Solyndra is a “Republican talking point.” I mentioned Solyndra only because most people know about it. If I had mentioned the $1.6 billion to NRG Engery, or the $646 million to Exelon, or the $737 million to SolarReserve, would you know what I was talking about? You can’t dismiss a point merely because it is often talked about among Republicans. You can argue the merits of the argument, but it will be an uphill battle for you with Solyndra. Incidentally, I never argue military actions on the issue of budget or cost. In my mind, you justify the action based on the need, but you don’t make a decision based on the cost. If you factor in the cost, you might win the battle but lose the country.
Gail August 27, 2012 at 06:50 pm
This article reminds me of the cold war joke when the US and Soviets had fierce Olympic competitions:
In a race of a US competitor vs a Soviet, the US came in first and the Soviet came in 2nd. The Soviet press reported it as "US comes in next to last and we came in 2nd". It's the truth, but is it HONEST? I think we all know the edgy morality involved in this story. What do Trent Latta and this Soviet story have in common? A LOT! Shame on you Trent for not only transparent distortions but also for clearly NOT identifying that you have a personal interest in promoting DelBene - by slamming her opponent via inferences (as Chris adequately noted). Not nice.
Trent Latta August 27, 2012 at 06:55 pm
Gail, these are John Koster's own acknowledged positions. There is no lie in that.
Trent
Chris Nandor August 27, 2012 at 07:19 pm
Trent: thank you for proving Gail's point.
Erin August 27, 2012 at 07:38 pm
Thanks for this great article sharing the publicly-stated political positions of John Koster. We all deserve to know where our candidates stand as we go to the polls.
Trent Latta August 27, 2012 at 09:39 pm
Thank you for the comment Erin.
Trent
Gail August 27, 2012 at 10:13 pm
Yes, thanks Trent for clarifying the sort of politics that stand behind DelBene. Thanks, but no thanks.
Chris Nandor August 28, 2012 at 02:11 pm
Given Trent's insistence that Koster's positions are demonstrated wrong by history, and his obvious favoritism toward DelBene as the alternative to Koster, I guess we can only assume that DelBene is for banning all guns, a blind believer in the 100 percent certainty of significant anthropogenic global warming, against any domestic oil drilling and energy independence, in favor of total federal control over our schools, against private savings as a means for providing for retirement, and in favor of abortion on demand at any time.
That's the only way it could be true that Koster's views have been demonstrated wrong by history, AND have DelBene be a reasonable alternative on these same issues.
Trent Latta August 28, 2012 at 03:01 pm
John Koster praises Rush Limbaugh and claims Rush Limbaugh is a "source of great pride to many of the citizens of the state of Washington."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJE3BzD5vTg
Ken James August 28, 2012 at 03:19 pm
And what is inaccurate about the statement that says he is a source of pride to many of the citizens of Washington? There are several million people who appreciate Limbaugh's conservative views. He is somewhat bombastic at times, but he is not a political figure. He is passionate and sometimes makes inarticulate statements to prove his points, but most of his positions are those shared by a majority.
Has your arguing style devolved into finding controversial statements, including those for which the speaker has apologized, and claiming that those statements represent the core beliefs of those who speak well of them? If so, I can't wait until you post the video of Rev. Wright screaming "God Dxxxx America" and our President saying that he won't disavow him any more than he would his grandmother. Is that a fair point of argument? Honest debate or slimy politics? If so, I guess we can all go to our political web sites and share 'moments from the past' or we can discuss issues.
Ken James August 28, 2012 at 03:23 pm
I realize that many people aren't familiar with Rush Limbaugh and would want to know more about a private person you want to thrust into the debate. They could read more about his views: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/ and decide if after a more thorough examination the association has the impact you desire.
Gail August 28, 2012 at 04:04 pm
Trent, your method of politics stinks. That sort of juvenile tactic would backfire on you instantly in a court of law. But if you want to defend that sort of morally reprehensible tactic, then Ken's reference to the Rev Wright "screaming" that Obama won't disavow must say spades about Obama. What say you Trent?
It's much more than devolved - your tactics show desperation Trent. Btw, I like listening to Rush - he's an ENTERTAINER, not a political figure.
Gail August 28, 2012 at 04:13 pm
Rev Wright and Obama - you decide
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=hwQWuQVE6sw
Trent Latta August 28, 2012 at 04:58 pm
Gail,
John Koster is the one who wrote a letter praising Rush Limbaugh, not me. If you think that type of politics stinks, then take it up with Koster. Also, Rev Wright may have said those things Ken James referred to, but Obama didn't. Once again, what I've stated here are comments made by, and positions held by, none other than John Koster.
Trent Latta August 28, 2012 at 05:52 pm
Edwin,
Whether Akin said what he said or not, the fact remains that these are John Koster's personal views. Trent
Ken James August 28, 2012 at 06:32 pm
Edwin, The fact remains, it is Trent Latta that is using slimy and misleading political tactics. I'm sure you have noticed that Trent Latta has dodged invitations to discuss issues and instead engages in attempts to smear opponents and brings discredit to those Democrats he is trying to promote. It's what he does because he doesn't have the confidence to argue their positions. It's the same tactic used my most Democrats this election cycle to distract from any discussion about the mess they have made of the economy and the fiscal health of the nation.
Gail August 28, 2012 at 07:43 pm
You really don't get it Trent. Koster liking/praising Rush has NOTHING TO DO with anything. So he likes an ENTERTAINER. What exactly is wrong here? You don't like Rush. So? I do. Rush is the #1 talk show radio guy in the US http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/
Gail August 28, 2012 at 07:52 pm
Trent, the inferred link to Wright and Obama is every bit as valid (arguably more so) as what you are attempting to do. Liking an entertainer is hardly the same as Rev Wright's comments with Obama refusing to disavow the remarks Wright made. Again, sad you can't cross the simple bridge to bring a bit of straight talk to the debte. Here's some simple advice - BE HONEST. It will help you mature.
Since you claim that Obama never said that, how does praising Rush mean anything? Using your exact same inference, how does what Rush say have anything to do with Koster? Remember, Rush is an ENTERTAINER and says what he says for audience ratings. What Wright said is for a very different reason. Trent, put on your big boy pants here - Obama apparently agreed enough that he wouldn't repudiate the remarks and said so (video makes that clear). Interesting isn't it what your sort of tactic result in when applied to clearly the same sort of 'guilt by association'. Only thing is, I like Rush (along with millions) and I don't think many people like Rev Wright's remarks. What say you now Trent?
Trent Latta August 30, 2012 at 03:03 pm
Washington’s public education system, if permitted the benefit of state-generated income, and if treated as the “paramount duty” our Constitution dictates, is alone capable of providing the excellent learning opportunities our children so entirely deserve. Charter Schools are not necessary.
http://kirkland.patch.com/blog_posts/back-to-charter-school
Mary Peterson August 30, 2012 at 03:34 pm
Well Trent, you are a well postioned Democratic official. You must know that your party controls our State Legislature. Your party controls the Governors Office. What is your party doing about it. Complaining won't work. If you answer please be civil. Please don't assume I'm a Republican either. You seem to be party driven so that is why I have structured my question this way.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Kirkland Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin June 14, 2013 at 06:34 am
In the City of Kirkland you need a City-issued business license to do Door-to-door solicitation. IRead More am willing to bet they did not have the license. Call the police next time.
Buddies at an exercise run!
Heather Stark June 17, 2013 at 01:36 am
This lady has a real way with dogs! Kind, soft spoken, yet authoritative with the dogs, you canRead More tell your pet will be in good hands. She's helped me with my Newfoundland and a friend's Clumber Spaniel. I highly recommend her.
Aging well seminar June 4th, 12th
Jeanne Gustafson (Editor) May 30, 2013 at 05:58 am
Hi Paul, I don't see the attached flyer. Could you try again to upload it to your announcement? I'mRead More sure a lot of people would love to have more details about the seminar.